3 – Water Pricing Principles in the EU

Exploring the intricacies of Water Pricing Principles in the EU provides invaluable insight into sustainable water management.

Published on
Share social

Exploring the intricacies of Water Pricing Principles in the EU provides invaluable insight into sustainable water management.

This article will delve into the key principles guiding water pricing in the EU: the Cost Recovery Principle, the Polluter Pays Principle, and other ancillary principles shedding light on their significance and interconnection with Integrated Water Resources Management.

Understanding Water Pricing, the Cost Recovery, and the Polluter Pays Principle

Water is a vital resource for human existence, economic activity, and the environment. In the European Union (EU), the significance of water is acknowledged in various legislations and policies. Two crucial principles central to EU water legislation are the Cost Recovery Principle and the Polluter Pays Principle. This article aims to provide an in-depth understanding of water pricing in the EU, along with detailed explanations of these two principles, some other ancillary principles and a general definition of the Integrated water resources management principle.

What is Water Pricing?

Water pricing refers to the methods by which the costs of providing water services are allocated to the users of those services. In practice, it includes the setting of tariffs or charges that water users pay for the provision of water and sanitation services and for the use of water resources (European Environment Agency, 2013). The pricing of water services aims to ensure that the costs of providing these services are covered and that there is an incentive for users to use water resources efficiently.

In the EU, water pricing is primarily guided by the Water Framework Directive (WFD, Directive 2000/60/EC), which sets out a comprehensive strategy for the protection of water resources. Article 9 of the WFD specifically requires member states to take into account the principle of recovery of the costs of water services, including environmental and resource costs (European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 2000).

Before explaining what the Cost Recovery Principle is, let’s define what environmental and resource costs are.

Environmental and Resource costs

The WATECO Guidance (2003) provides initial definitions: environmental costs refer to “the costs of damage that water uses impose on the environment and ecosystems and those who use the environment,” whereas the resource cost “represents the costs of foregone opportunities which other uses suffer due to the depletion of the resource beyond its natural rate of recharge or recovery.”

To better clarify the differences between the two concepts:

  • Environmental Costs: These are the costs related to damage that happens when we use water in a certain way, like taking water out of a river or releasing pollutants into it. This harm can be split into two categories. The first is about the price we pay for harming the water environment. Think about it like this: we all value maintaining healthy rivers, lakes, and oceans. The second one concerns the cost to the people who use that water environment. For example, if a factory pollutes a river, it can hurt the fishermen who rely on that river to catch fish.
  • Resource Costs: These are the costs related to using water in a specific way when there might be a better use for it. For example, let’s say we have a certain amount of water that we could either use to water a farm or supply to a city. If the benefits we get from supplying water to the city (like people being able to drink and clean) are more than the benefits we get from watering the farm (like growing crops), then the “resource cost” is the loss we experience by choosing the less beneficial option. So, these costs arise when we don’t use our water in the most economically beneficial way. They’re about more than just running out of water or polluting it. They’re about making the best choices on how we use our water and when.

Defined what environmental and resource costs are, we can then start addressing the main principles used in water pricing, starting with the Cost Recovery Principle.

The Cost Recovery Principle

The Cost Recovery Principle forms a cornerstone of EU water policy. As per Article 9 of the WFD, member states should ensure by 2010 that water pricing policies provide adequate incentives for users to use water resources efficiently and thereby contribute to the environmental objectives of the directive. It also introduces the principle that the cost of water services should be recovered from the different water users (households, industry, and agriculture) (European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 2000).

Defined in the EU Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), the cost recovery principle dictates that “all water users effectively and proportionately participate financially in the recovery of the costs of water services.” This principle states that the expenses of providing water services and managing water resources should be recovered through tariffs and other charges rather than being subsidized through general tax revenue. This approach is essential to ensure the long-term sustainability of water services and resources and to encourage the efficient use of water resources.

Practical applications of the cost recovery principle in the water sector are manifold. They include the use of tariffs to cover the costs of water treatment, distribution, and sewage treatment, as well as charges for water abstraction and wastewater discharge. These mechanisms ensure that water management costs are equitably shared among all water users.

Another crucial principle in water pricing is the Polluter Pays Principle.

The Polluter Pays Principle

The Polluter Pays Principle (PPP) is a widely accepted environmental policy principle that is also part of EU water legislation. The PPP is a principle according to which the costs of pollution prevention and control measures should be borne by the person responsible for the pollution (European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 2004). It is enshrined in Article 191(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and underpins several environmental directives, including the WFD.

The Polluter Pays Principle is closely linked to the Cost Recovery Principle in the context of water pricing. As part of the ‘full cost’ of water services, the environmental costs should be reflected in the prices paid by water users. Therefore, if a water user is causing pollution (e.g., by discharging pollutants into a river), they should bear the cost of this damage, and this cost should be reflected in the prices they pay for water services (European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 2000).

Implementing the PPP in practice involves identifying the parties responsible for environmental damage, assessing the cost of this damage, and ensuring that these costs are included in water pricing. The WFD provides for the possibility of exemptions from the Cost Recovery Principle in certain circumstances, but the intention is clearly to incentivize sustainable water use and to ensure that the costs of environmental damage and resource use are internalized in the prices paid by water users (European Parliament and Council of the European Union, 2000).

Other principles guiding water pricing

  • Economic Efficiency: This principle promotes the efficient use of water resources and the reduction of waste through the use of market-based mechanisms and incentives. The principle of economic efficiency is not explicitly defined in European legislation but is recognized as a guiding principle in the EU Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Practical examples of economic efficiency in the water sector include using water tariffs to incentivize water conservation and using tradable water rights to allocate water resources among users in the most efficient manner. The rationale behind this principle is that it promotes the sustainable and efficient use of water resources and helps to ensure that water is used in a way that maximizes its social, economic, and environmental benefits. In France, the economic efficiency principle is applied through the development of water resources for multiple uses, such as agriculture, energy production, and recreation. This allows for the optimization of water use and helps ensure that water resources are used most efficiently and effectively.
  • Environmental Protection: This principle aims to protect and improve the water environment and the quality of water resources. It is defined in the EU Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) and is meant to ensure that water management practices do not have a negative impact on the water environment and its ecosystems. Practical examples of environmental protection in the water sector include using water quality standards to regulate the discharge of pollutants into water bodies and implementing measures to reduce water abstractions from rivers and lakes. The rationale behind this principle is that it helps to ensure the long-term sustainability of water resources and the protection of aquatic ecosystems. In the United Kingdom, the environmental protection principle is applied through the implementation of strict regulations and standards for the discharge of pollutants into waterways. This helps to protect sensitive ecosystems and promote water quality for the benefit of wildlife and human health.
  • Social Equity: This principle promotes equitable access to water and the provision of water services to all, regardless of their ability to pay. It is not explicitly defined in European legislation but is recognized as a guiding principle in the EU Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). Practical examples of social equity in the water sector include the provision of subsidies for low-income households to access water services and the implementation of measures to ensure the availability of safe drinking water in rural and remote areas. The rationale behind this principle is that it helps to ensure that water is used in a way that benefits all members of society and does not unfairly burden any particular group. In Greece, the social equity principle is applied through the provision of universal access to water services, regardless of socioeconomic status. This helps to ensure that everyone has access to safe and affordable drinking water and helps to reduce inequalities in access to basic services.

Integrated Water Resources Management and the pricing principles

Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) is an approach to managing water resources that aims to balance the socio-economic needs of society with the needs of the environment. The main objective of IWRM is to promote the sustainable use of water resources, ensuring the long-term availability of water for all uses, including human consumption, agriculture, industry, and environmental preservation. The principles of Cost Recovery and Polluter Pays directly feed into this holistic approach to water management.

Cost Recovery Principle and IWRM

The Cost Recovery Principle in IWRM implies that all costs associated with water services, including operational, maintenance, and capital costs, as well as environmental and resource costs, should be recovered from users based on their usage. This aligns with one of the central tenets of IWRM – that water has an economic value in all its competing uses and should be recognized as an economic good. By assigning a price to water, the Cost Recovery Principle encourages efficient use, discourages waste, and enables the necessary investment in infrastructure and services to be made. This allows for the sustainable management of water resources.

Moreover, the revenue generated from water charges can be used to improve and expand water infrastructure, fund conservation initiatives, and promote equitable access to water services. These actions directly contribute to achieving IWRM’s sustainable and equitable water management goal.

Polluter Pays Principle and IWRM

The Polluter Pays Principle is closely tied to the IWRM approach, promoting the sustainable use of water resources by discouraging behaviours that lead to environmental degradation. As implemented through pollution charges or fines, this principle incentivizes water users, particularly industries, to minimize their pollution footprint, adopt cleaner technologies, and improve waste management practices.

In addition, it encourages the internalization of environmental costs. By holding polluters financially accountable for the environmental damage they cause, this principle ensures that the cost of pollution is not borne by society at large or future generations. This approach helps balance the environmental protection and economic development objectives of IWRM, ensuring that economic activities do not compromise the health and sustainability of water resources.

The Interrelation of the Principles and IWRM

In essence, both the Cost Recovery and Polluter Pays Principles work in tandem to support the objectives of IWRM. They stimulate efficient and responsible use of water resources, promote sustainability, and foster economic and environmental balance. By embedding these principles into water governance frameworks, policymakers can drive sustainable practices among water users and work towards long-term, integrated management of water resources.

Conclusion

In conclusion, water is a valuable resource that demands careful management, particularly in light of economic development, population growth, and climate change. Understanding water pricing is critical to ensuring the sustainability and efficient use of this vital resource. The principles of Cost Recovery and Polluter Pays form the backbone of the EU’s water pricing framework. These principles, along with considerations of economic efficiency, environmental protection, and social equity, are crucial for a comprehensive water management approach.

In the face of the escalating global water crisis, understanding these principles and their application in water management is more critical than ever. By incorporating these principles into policy and practice, we can foster a more sustainable relationship with our water resources, ensuring their availability for future generations.

This article is a part of the ‘Water Basics Series,’ a collection of pieces designed to shed light on the water sector and water regulation. To learn more about this vital sector, you can return to the main page of the series and explore other articles.

Stay updated with the latest articles in this series by following WAREG on LinkedIn and Twitter, and consider subscribing to WAREG’s monthly newsletter. By doing so, you’ll be among the first to know when new pieces are released, allowing you to continue expanding your knowledge about the water sector.

Water Basics Series

References:

European Environment Agency. (2013). Assessment of cost recovery through water pricing. [PDF file]. Retrieved from https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/assessment-of-full-cost-recovery/at_download/file

European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, L327, 1-72.

European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2004). Directive 2004/35/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. Official Journal of the European Union, L143, 56-75.